THE IDENTITY OF JOHN BISHOP, GUNNER, 1625. The “earliest dated artifact” discovered at Martin’s Hundred, a colonial habitation on the north bank of the James River near Carter’s Grove, Virginia, is a stamped lead strip from a lattice window. According to Ivor Noel Hume, “words and a date molded in relief and hidden within the leaden fold that had gripped the glass”[1] were revealed during routine cleaning: “:Iohn: Byshapp of Exceter Gonner 1625.”[2] Hume concludes Martin’s Hundred by posing the question of John Bishop’s identity and asking “why he wanted his name and address hidden in tiny letters where no one could read them?” This note attempts to answer both queries, based upon the belief that the inscription can be translated as “John Bishop of Exeter, Gunner, 1625.”

On 11 January 1631/2 Charles I informed the Treasurer and Undertreasurer of the Exchequer of Receipt that he had appointed one “John Bishopp” to be the royal “handgunmaker.” Bishop received an annuity of £12, payable from the Tellers of the Exchequer of Receipt, who disbursed the king’s revenues. The first installment was paid at the last feast of the annunciation of the Virgin and the “handgunmaker” enjoyed his pension at Charles I’s pleasures, which he apparently did throughout the years of the “Personal Rule.”[3] Certainly he continued on through the Bishops’ Wars[4] for on 17 April 1640 he collected £24 from John Saville, one of the four tellers at the Exchequer of Receipt, accounting for two years’ service. The order book describes the recipient as “John Bishop his Majesties handgunmaker in ordinary.”[5] Unfortunately, no manuscript evidence connects this “John Bishop, gunner” to the Devonshire city of Exeter. Circumstantial evidence, however, suggests that Bishop was a west country man who had come to the metropolis, where gun-making flourished in the 1630s.[6] In 1632 he came to the attention of the king and entered royal service.[7] An entry in the Ordnance Office records suggests an answer to the second question, namely, how did Bishop’s name get on the concealed side of the leading of a lattice? Along with the manufacture of pistols and the like, Bishop also worked in lead. Certainly a gunmaker, or gunner, cast his own shot from lead ingots. But John Bishop also made “musket molds” and in fact seems to have been something of a designer or inventor of various firearms and molds. In January 1638/9, on the eve of the first Bishops’ War, his royal master awarded him £5 for having fashioned a “Muskett Mold” for the Earl of Newport, the Master of the Ordnance. He received the money from a fund of £5,375 designated to increase the arsenal of pistols, carbines and firearms accessories. The sum was granted above and beyond his pension of pistols, carbines and firearms accessories. The sum was granted above and beyond his pension “in regard of his invencion and extraordinary Care and paynes.”[8] The Order was accompanied by a letter from Newport which apparently is no longer extant. Bishop, then, manufactured guns and worked in lead. Is it possible that in 1625 he maintained a shop in Exeter and, quite naturally, had stamped the wares and materials in his shop? Gunmakers and swordmakers customarily emblazoned their names on their creations, something that was done quite frequently in this period of intensive arms manufacture during the era of the Thirty Years’ War. Buyers often insisted on proof of the place of manufacture. The “musket mold” entry, too, implies that Bishop cast lead as well as forged steel. Is it possible that the windon lead from “site A” came from Bishop’s gunmakers shop, presumably in Exeter? Perhaps a lattice window maker purchased lead from Bishop’s stores or cannibalized some used molds or ingots. Bishop might well have traded in lead and marked his ingots to attest to their quality. The Bishop ‘trademark” would quite understandably be turned inside for reasons of aesthetics. Of course, this scenario suggests that John Bishop never set foot in Virginia, which is something of a disappointment. But it is intriguing to surmise that if indeed the windows were shipped from Exeter, made with John Bishop’s lead, some of the firearms used by the settler at Martin’s Hundred came from Exeter as well, perhaps even from the shop of “John Bishop, Gunner.”



[1] Martin’s Hundred (New York 1982) p. 324. Professors Andrew R. L. Clayton and James H. Kettner kindly commented upon an earlier draft of this piece. Any errors are, of course, the responsibility of the present writer.

[2] “New Clues to an Old Mystery”, National Geographic, v. 161 no. 1 p. 77

[3] Public Record Office, Auditor’s Privy Seal Book 1632-7, E 403/2567 f. b verso. Andrew Thrush kindly transcribed this entry.

[4] Mark Charles Fissel, The Bishops’ Wars: Charles I’s Campaigns Against Scotland 1638-1640 (forthcoming, Cambridge University Press).

[5] P.R.O., Tellers of the Exchequer of Receipt Order Book, E 403/2813 f. 47 verso.

[6] Charles encouraged the manufacture of firearms, incorporating the London Gunmakers’ Company on 14 March 1637/8 under the Privy Seal, Guildhall Library Ms 5228, roll of vellum with seal, and Corporation of London Records Office, Journal of the Common Council v. 38 ff. 60-67 verso.

[7] The king promoted military innovation, extending his patronage to improve the martial condition of his realm. Mark Charles Fissel, “Tradition and Invention in the Early Stuart of War”, Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research, vol. 65, no. 263, Autumn 1987.

[8] P. R. O., Ordnance Office warrant Books, War Office [W. O.] 49/71 f. 52.