Preface to Flood.
Floods Happen.
by Bill Wells, Reese Library, Augusta State University. 2006.
“The Savannah River is a stream bold in all of its
features,” wrote Augusta, Georgia ’s 1914 weather bureau officer-in-charge Eugene D. Emigh.[1]
The Savannah River is formed by the union of the Seneca and Tugaloo Rivers some one hundred miles above Augusta and has its cultural and physical ties to both Georgia and South Carolina. Emigh wrote, for its size, the Savannah is a “restless river” with
intermittent stretches of water “rushing over the granite bed” and “resting in placid
pools.” Overall the river made a rapid passage to Augusta with a
257-foot drop over the sixty-four miles immediately preceding Augusta. The
last “rapids” are about six miles above Augusta but once past the city the river
turns into a slow, meandering course to the sea.
Part of the river’s rush to Augusta is the up-state
topography. The “catchment” area above Augusta entails a geological formation of
the Piedmont
Plateau with its foundations of granite and gneiss. The elevation of the plateau ranges from 200 feet above sea level in the
east to 1000 feet in the west. Further north, the mountains reach 2000 feet
with some well beyond. All the height, combined with hard surfaces, made natural
runways for water run-off. At that time, the only factor preventing larger
run-off was the dense forests of the 7,294 square mile watershed. The
denseness of the forest acted to absorb the moisture through the roots or by evaporation. The concern was the large deforestation for agricultural
purposes. Emigh cited that the watershed above Augusta shrank during the 1859
to 1912 period from 70% to 19%. The result was by 1909 only 25% of the
catchment area remained forested. A positive factor of the period was during
the peak rainfall periods of January, February, March, and April the land was
being plowed for new crops and this plowed land was “ideal” for rainfall
storage.
The ideal river height level for the Savannah River was 20
feet. This level afforded water transportation as well as allowing logging
companies to float logs out the swampy regions south of Augusta. River water
would not enter Augusta until the 32-foot mark (pre-levee) and was not a real
danger to the businesses until the 34-foot mark. Emigh noted, “At 36 feet a
wide area of the business and residence sections is covered to depths of 1 to 3
feet.”
It was held that water run-off was caused by two causes.
Primary was direct falling rain and secondary a gradual supply from
saturated soil or from the forest floor. It was more common in cultivated lands
following a slow but steady rainfall. Emigh argued this was truer for long
rivers, but the short span of the upper Savannah River “freshets” came from the
delayed flow when one rain supersaturates the soil and is followed by another
rain a few days later. This combination of rapid run-off and soil saturation presented the greatest
possibility of flooding. However, by 1914 the number of days the Savannah
River, at Augusta, was above the 20-foot mark increased with the “expansion of
agricultural and contraction of forest area.”[2] The theory that plowed ground would hold more water was shown that the forests were needed to help control run off as well.
Emigh’s study of rainfall versus river height produced
interesting comments. He concluded,
Starting
from the initial stages below 16 feet, the normal amount of rise in the
Savannah River at Augusta for each inch of rain in 24 hours over the catchment
area with the ground in moist condition is 8.5 feet. This remains true until
rain has brought the river to its 29-foot stage. Any surplus of water above
that necessary to cause a 29-foot stage has a value of about 3 feet for each
inch of rain.[3]
Year |
Rainfall, January-April |
Days of 20 feet or over. |
1903 |
24.6 |
23 |
1906 |
17.8 |
14 |
1908 |
19.8 |
24 |
1909 |
18.2 |
12 |
1912 |
25.2 |
25 |
Means |
21.1 |
20 |
| Emigh, 51. |
Interestingly, rises above the 34-foot level were negligible
with the greater rises occurring at the 16-foot level. He dismissed any
calculation of rainfall that would not bring the level to 20-feet and theorized
that it would take some twelve inches of rain during the first four months of
the year to bring the river to the 20-foot mark.
Unknowingly predicting the Flood of 1929, Emigh predicted,
“If precipitation be of short duration but great intensity, it occasions a high
stage that keeps the river above 20 feet for several days.” Rain, soil
saturation, or run-off was not the only considerations of Emigh. The “flashy”
nature of the river itself had to be included in the estimations.
The freshets of the Savannah River have a long history. The
greatest was the flood of 1796, reaching an average of 40 feet making it the
greatest pre-levee flood in the city’s history. The 1929 (post-levee) flood
marks the greatest in height, but the 1930 flood exceeded in volume of water
flowing past Augusta.
Table 2.--Annual
peak stages and discharges for the Savannah River at Augusta, Ga. (02197000) for the period 1796 - 1985 |
[ft, feet; ft3/s,
cubic feet per second] |
Water
year |
Date |
Stage
(ft) |
Discharge
(ft3/s) |
|
Water
year |
Date |
|
Stage
(ft) |
Discharge
(ft3/s) |
|
Water
year |
Date |
Stage
(ft) |
Discharge
(ft3/s) |
1 1796 |
Jan. 17 |
40 |
360,000 |
|
1909 |
June |
5 |
|
28.7 |
87,300 |
|
1947 |
Jan. |
22 |
23.97 |
86,000 |
1840 |
May 28 |
37.8 |
270,000 |
|
1910 |
Mar. |
2 |
|
26.4 |
69,800 |
|
1948 |
Feb. |
10 |
23.90 |
83,200 |
2 1852 |
Aug. 29 |
37.4 |
250,000 |
|
1911 |
Apr. |
14 |
|
19.1 |
32,800 |
|
1949 |
Nov. |
30 |
26.61 |
154,000 |
3 1864 |
Jan. 1 |
34.9 |
185,000 |
|
1912 |
Mar. |
17 |
|
36.8 |
234,000 |
|
1950 |
Oct. |
9 |
20.10 |
32,500 |
1865 |
Jan. 11 |
36.9 |
240,000 |
|
1913 |
Mar. |
16 |
|
35.1 |
156,000 |
|
1951 |
Oct. |
22 |
22.32 |
46,300 |
1876 |
Dec. 30 |
28.6 |
86,400 |
|
1914 |
Dec. |
31 |
|
24.3 |
48,000 |
|
61952 |
Mar. |
6 |
21.53 |
39,300 |
1877 |
Apr. 14 |
31.4 |
119,000 |
|
1915 |
Jan. |
20 |
|
28.2 |
61,000 |
|
1953 |
May |
8 |
20.80 |
35,200 |
1878 |
Nov. 23 |
23.5 |
51,500 |
|
1916 |
Feb. |
3 |
|
31.0 |
82,400 |
|
1954 |
Mar. |
30 |
17.39 |
25,500 |
1879 |
Aug. 3 |
22.0 |
44,000 |
|
1917 |
Mar. |
6 |
|
29.2 |
68,000 |
|
1955 |
Apr. |
15 |
16.77 |
23,900 |
1880 |
Dec. 16 |
30.1 |
102,000 |
|
1918 |
Jan. |
30 |
|
25.5 |
45,500 |
|
1956 |
Apr. |
12 |
14.70 |
18,600 |
1881 |
Mar. 18 |
32.2 |
130,000 |
|
1919 |
Dec. |
24 |
|
35.0 |
128,000 |
|
1957 |
May |
7 |
14.08 |
18,000 |
1882 |
Sept.12 |
29.3 |
93,300 |
|
1920 |
Dec. |
11 |
|
35.4 |
133,000 |
|
1958 |
Apr. |
18 |
22.91 |
66,300 |
1883 |
Jan. 22 |
30.8 |
111,000 |
|
1921 |
Feb. |
11 |
|
35.1 |
129,000 |
|
1959 |
June |
8 |
18.65 |
28,500 |
1884 |
Apr. 16 |
28.0 |
81,000 |
|
1922 |
Feb. |
16 |
|
32.0 |
92,000 |
|
1960 |
Feb. |
14 |
20.58 |
34,900 |
1885 |
Jan. 26 |
27.5 |
77,000 |
|
1923 |
Feb. |
28 |
|
28.0 |
59,700 |
|
'1961 |
Apr. |
2 |
20.56 |
34,800 |
1886 |
May 21 |
32.5 |
135,000 |
|
1924 |
Sept.22 |
|
28.0 |
59,700 |
|
1962 |
Jan. |
9 |
20.09 |
32,500 |
1887 |
July 31 |
34.5 |
173,000 |
|
1925 |
Jan. |
20 |
|
36.5 |
150,000 |
|
1963 |
Mar. |
23 |
19.52 |
31,300 |
1888 |
Sept-11 |
38.7 |
303,000 |
|
1926 |
Jan. |
20 |
|
27.3 |
55,300 |
|
1964 |
Apr. |
9 |
24.16 |
87,100 |
1889 |
Feb. 19 |
33.3 |
149,000 |
|
1927 |
Dec. |
30 |
|
24.0 |
39,000 |
|
1965 |
Dec. |
27 |
20.62 |
34,600 |
1890 |
Feb. 27 |
22.9 |
48,500 |
|
1928 |
Aug. |
17 |
|
40.4 |
226,000 |
|
1966 |
Mar. |
6 |
21.50 |
39,300 |
1891 |
Mar. 10 |
35.5 |
197,000 |
|
1929 |
Sept |
27 |
|
46.3 |
343,000 |
|
1967 |
Aug. |
25 |
18.10 |
26,500 |
1892 |
Jan. 20 |
32.8 |
140,000 |
|
1930 |
Oct. |
2 |
|
45.1 |
350,000 |
|
1968 |
Jan. |
12 |
20.94 |
35,900 |
1893 |
Feb. 14 |
25.0 |
60,000 |
|
1931 |
Nov. |
17 |
|
19.9 |
26,100 |
|
1969 |
Apr. |
21 |
22.24 |
45,600 |
1894 |
Aug. 7 |
24.0 |
54,000 |
|
1932 |
Jan. |
9 |
|
30.4 |
93,800 |
|
1970 |
Apr. |
1 |
17.68 |
25,200 |
1895 |
Jan. 11 |
30.4 |
106,000 |
|
1933 |
Oct. |
18 |
|
30.3 |
92,600 |
|
1971 |
Mar. |
5 |
23.30 |
63,900 |
1896 |
July 10 |
30.5 |
107,000 |
|
1934 |
Mar. |
5 |
|
28.5 |
73,200 |
|
1972 |
Jan. |
20 |
20.36 |
33,700 |
1897 |
Apr. 6 |
29.3 |
93,300 |
|
1935 |
Mar. |
15 |
|
27.4 |
63,700 |
|
1973 |
Apr. |
8 |
21.63 |
40,200 |
1898 |
Sept. 2 |
31.3 |
117,000 |
|
1936 |
Apr. |
8 |
|
41.2 |
258,000 |
|
1974 |
Feb. |
23 |
20.13 |
32,900 |
1899 |
Feb. 8 |
31.0 |
113,000 |
|
1937 |
Jan. |
4 |
|
30.1 |
91,400 |
|
1975 |
Mar. |
25 |
22.24 |
45,600 |
1900 |
Feb. 15 |
32.7 |
138,000 |
|
1938 |
Oct. |
21 |
|
30.1 |
91,400 |
|
1976 |
June |
5 |
20.27 |
33,300 |
1901 |
Apr. 4 |
31.8 |
124,000 |
|
1939 |
'Mar. |
2 |
3 |
24.10 |
90,900 |
|
1977 |
Apr. |
7 |
20.50 |
34,200 |
1902 |
Mar. 1 |
34.6 |
175,000 |
|
1940 |
Aug. |
15 |
|
29.40 |
239,000 |
|
1978 |
Jan. |
26 |
21.98 |
43,100 |
1903 |
Feb. 9 |
33.2 |
147,000 |
|
1941 |
| | |