Course Title: Inquiry Based Models of Teaching
Course Prefix and Number: EDTD 6262
Instructor: Dr. Mark Warner
mwarner@aug.edu 667-4503
Hours: 3 semester hours
Prerequisites: admission to graduate program and completion of
EDTD 6161
Course Description: This course focuses on teaching approaches that
make use of natural curiosity and desire to make sense of the world. Approaches
include problem based learning, discovery learning, inquiry, concept development,
and synectics. Emphasis is placed on development of curriculum and
authentic assessment practices, and the development of pertinent skills
related to using integrated approaches.
National Board Standards Addressed:
I. Teachers are committed to students and their learning
· uses multiple resources, including technology instruction
and in guiding learning
· values student questions
· curricular activities rely on primary data sources and manipulative
materials
· uses a variety of assessment procedures, techniques, and instruments
· focuses on meeting individual needs of learners
· focuses on meeting student developmental needs
II. Teachers know the subjects they teach and how to teach those
subjects to students.
· focuses on real world connections and applications of content
learning
· assesses student achievement or performance in situations
that closely match the standards and challenges of the world outside the
classroom
· flexible in all phases of instruction seeking the students’
points of view in order to understand students’ present conceptions/misconceptions
for use in subsequent lessons
· acts as a facilitator of learning – questioning, guided discovery,
problem based, inquiry to understand content
· engages students in active/interactive learning by mediating
the environment for the students with discussion, role play, simulations,
games, and student conducted research
III. Teachers are responsible for managing and monitoring student
learning.
· creates, enriches, maintains and alters instructional settings
to capture and sustain the interest of their students and to make the most
effective use of time.
· engages students and adults to assist their teaching and at
enlisting their colleagues' knowledge and expertise to complement their
own.
IV. Teachers think systematically about their practice and learn
from experience
· life long learning and reflection upon improved practice
· grounds practice on inquiry and research
· evaluation on impact on student learning to guide further
instructional decisions
Teaching For Understanding Questions Addressed:
3. How are standards based curriculum and instruction reflective/suggestive
of teaching for understanding; how doe they support teaching for understanding?
4. What approaches to curriculum design support or promote teaching
for understanding?
5. Why isn't activity-based instruction adequate to the task of teaching
for understanding?
6. How is instructional time affected when teaching for understanding?
7. How can teaching for understanding best be assessed? With
what theories and practices of assessment is teaching for understanding
compatible?
10. What kind and quality of teacher knowledge does teaching for understanding
require (subject matter, pedagogical, interpersonal, other)?
11. Why is preparing for instruction more appropriate to teaching for
understanding
than is planning for instruction? What would change for you as a teacher,
when preparing rather than planning?
Course
Outline
Course Requirements:
(1)
Assigned Readings and Message Board Reflections
(2)
Frame and Develop a Problem Based Learning Unit that addresses Georgia
Quality Core Curriculum
(3) Design Embedded
Lessons for Discovery Learning, Inquiry, Concept Development, and Synectics
(4)
Evaluate 4 quality Web Quests in your content area and justify their use
in your classroom
(5) Problem Based Learning Unit Presentation
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Borich, G. (1996). Effective Teaching Methods (3rd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall
Brooks, J.G. and M.G. (1993). In Search Of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. ASCD
Delisle, Robert. (1997). How to Use Problem Based Learning in the Classroom. ASCD
Dewey, J. (1991). How We Think. Buffalo: Prometheus Books
Glynn, S. M., Duit, R., Thiele, R. B. (1995). Teaching science with
analogies: A strategy for constructing knowledge. In S. M.Glynn and R.
Duit (Eds.). Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice
(pp. 247-273). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Martorella, P.H. (1994). Concept Learning and Higher Level Thinking. In J.M. Cooper (Ed.), Classroom Teaching Skills (5th edition) Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath
Marzano, R. (1993). Assessing student outcomes. ASCD.
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Torp, and Sage, S. (1998). Problems as Possibilities: Problem Based Learning for K-12 Education. ASCD
Wiske, M. (Ed.) (1998). Teaching For Understanding: Linking Research
with Practice
San Francisco: Josey-Bass
Helpful Internet Sites
http://www.exploratorium.edu/
http://edweb.sdsu.edu/webquest/webquest.html
http://www.lightspan.com/
http://www.pbli.org/index.htm
http://www.imsa.edu/team/cpbl/cpbl.html
http://www.newcastle.edu.au/services/iesd/learndevelop/problarc/
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/edutech/projects/lbdview.html
http://www.coe.uga.edu/edpsych/faculty/glynn/twa.html
http://scied.gsu.edu/Hassard/mos/7.4.html
http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/idmodels.html